From: MikeLDrew@aol.com Subject: Fwd: Re: Meriha fans Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 02:19:53 -0400 (EDT) ![]()
DeTomaso Mailing List: April 1997, Message #94
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All, Chris Bupp sent this to me instead of The List, for some reason. BTW, I flew C-12's (Beech Super King Air B-200, a twin-turboprop executive plane) in Korea for a year, which is the only reason I have anything more than a passing familiarity with the principles of propellers (and thus radiator fans.) Mike --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: Meriha fans Date: 97-04-13 12:06:14 EDT From: Whatcop To: MikeLDrew Mike; Your answer on fan blades is quite insightful and fits what little I remember about aerodynamics. I could say that I would have thought you too young to remember all that stuff about PROPELLERS, as most of your career has been flying planes with the dog whistle type of thrust producers......but I won't. You did mention about a four blade fan that has blades NOT at 90 degrees apart. I believe that is to prevent noise from harmonics that can occur with symetrical blade set ups. Many factory engine/water pump fans, especially on domestic cars, have blades unequally spaced around the circle. I suspect this noise problem would have been more likely to occur with the big, large pitch fan blades on many older front engine rear drive vehicles. I would also assume such assymetrical blades are NOT used on prop aircraft because of their size and weight and resultant much lower rpm to prevent tip speed from going supersonic. I would also have to believe that assymetrical blade systems would be much harder to balance, and that would be very bad for a plane, since the prop is also the flywheel for piston engines............ chris