From: "Jim Firanzi" <firanzi@erols.com> Subject: Re: Handling and Tire/Wheel Selection Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 13:07:54 -0400 ![]()
DeTomaso Mailing List: May 1997, Message #95
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jack, Thanks for the advice. Any thoughts on tire induced understeer exaggerated by the excessively large tires in the rear? What are you running on your car? As far as my ' 72, it's about as stiff as you can get right now. Poly bushings all around, Koni's adjusted to stiff setting. Ask Mike Drew... his comment when driving it was something about being near "go-cart ride" if I remember right~! Is there anyone on the list who changed from narrow to wide tires and who would be willing to comment on the differences in handling, both at the limit in a turn and on freeway / secondary roads? Thanks, Jim ---------- > From: JDeRyke@aol.com > To: firanzi@erols.com; detomaso@wgate.com > Subject: Re: Handling and Tire/Wheel Selection > Date: Saturday, May 03, 1997 4:02 AM > > Jim, you can safely run a 245-50x 15 Goodyear Eagle Gatorback or equiv. on > the stock 8" in front, clearing everything & no flares. Your idea of the 16" > rear XGT 315-40 is OK, too, if the tire is V- or Z-rated, or you have > superhuman control of your emotions. Most guys that opt for giant tires do so > partly to make room for equally giant brakes, and the 16" wheels won't clear > rotors much bigger in dia. than stock. The front rotors must obviously stay > stock dia. Second drawback to huge meats (other than cost): the car will > 'wagon-track' or follow pavement lines much more than somewhat narrower > tires. 3rd negative: the shorter the profile, the stiffer the ride will > become. My advice: see if you can borrow a drive in a car rigged like you > think you want, compared to another that is running more conservative tire > sizes. Be sure to go on secondary roads as well as freeway, too. Let Debra > try to parallel-park the thing. Then, make an informed decision. J DeRyke