DeTomaso Mailing List: September 97, Message #107

[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]
From: JDeRyke@aol.com Subject: Re: strokin' Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 14:35:03 -0400 (EDT)
This gets into engine design a bit. Over 25 years time, builders found that the 327/350 Chevy rod journal size ( 2.225 dia x.944 w) coincidently was better for high-speed heavy load (eg, racing) work, than the 351C Ford size (2.3107 x .824 w), while the Ford main bearing size was stronger than the Chevy. It's interesting that the total surface area of both rod bearings are very close, but the wider Chev size seems to be better for speeds of 6000 -9000 rpm. Remember, the engine doesn't know (or care) who built the components. And because they built a bazillion SBChevs while 351Cs were only built fm '70 to '74, demand for Cleveland stuff is non-existent by comparison. Oh, well... J DeRyke ==============================================================================

[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]