From: Dennis Antenucci <itbewild@gte.net> Subject: Myopic??? Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 02:33:15 +0000 ![]()
DeTomaso Mailing List: November 97, Message #9
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Myopic? Anecdotal? Irreverent? You-know-who-you-are? Erudite? Articulate? Salient? Definitive? Who's gonna make me? You? Don't make me laugh! Save the lectures for your kids. Mad Dog KVERGES@figdav.com wrote: > > In this corner, we have the myopic everything should be DeTomaso, I love DeTomaso, DeTomaso is the fastest & coolest, I'm gonna have one of every car DeTomaso > > In another corner we have the Japanese-cars-are-fast-epecially-when-race-prepared-and-expertly-driven crowd (with lots of righteous explanation and anecdotal s > > And then we have the irreverent and dorky hecklers just stirring the pot. > > You know who you are. > > Let me summarize the erudite, articulate, and meaningful commentary thus: > > 1. NA NA NA NA NA NAAA > > 2. Mines faster than yours! > > 3. Is not! > > 4. Is so! > > 5. IS NOT! > > 6. IS SO! > > 7. NOT! > > 8. SO! > > 9. NOT!SO!NOT!SO!...... > > 10. Well, your car is a sucky piece of crap! > > 11. Well, your car is a broken-down, ancient old junkpile! > > 12. Well, your car got no soul or style! > > 13. Yeah, well I wouldn't even have a car like yours if I could afford another one! > > 14. Well, I'm just going to have to whup your ass for that! > > 15. Come get some in Vegas! > > 16. Go to No. 1 or add a few extra comments about farm animals, ancestors, clothes, education, appearance or any other irrelevant but (hopefully) irritating in > > Does this about cover it, or did I miss some particularly salient and definitive aspect of the debate? > > Why don't we expend the energy helping plan for, organize, and run a track event in Vegas next April instead? > > Keith