From: "Charles F Engles Jr." <engles@qns.com> Subject: sway bars Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 21:56:29 +0000 ![]()
DeTomaso Mailing List: January 98, Message #70
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dear Jack, At the risk of discussing the Pantera sway bars to death, I want to ask you about your mod of using a smaller than stock front sway bar. To the amateur (me), this sounds a lot like Bob Woodhouse's recommendation, if you don't have his super trick adjustable sway bars, to NOT use a front sway bar, i.e. remove it. This seems very unconventional to me and rather drastic. Your recommendation from your years of campaigning the Pantera on the autocross tracks is to use a smaller than normal front sway bar. Can you explain how these seemingly "unnatural" fixes improve the Pantera's handling? The May date for the Porsche club at Hallett comes up soon! Chuck Engles ---------- > From: JDeRyke <JDeRyke@aol.com> > To: Multiple recipients of list <detomaso@realbig.com> > Subject: Re: Re[3]: Self Cancel turn signals > Date: Friday, January 02, 1998 1:03 PM > > Biggest problem with the Pantera's handling is, you cannot cram enough front > tire under the stock fenders to overcome the built-in understeer that Ford > designed for us. Also, a tight posi differential will cause even more > understeer. Try a smaller-than-stock front swaybar (we used 0.625 dia; stock > is 0.815), a GTS (.875 dia.) rear bar, 245-50 x 15" front tires and no wider > than 275-50 x 15" rears. This will get most street Panteras closer to neutral > handling, but remember, understeer is idiot-proof: when it slides, back off > the gas and thinks are OK. Oversteer is dangerous: when it slides, don't move > the gas at all or you'll spin! Neutral handling is really ragged-edge > handling. J DeRyke