DeTomaso Mailing List: April 99, Message #230
| From: | Rick <rwgushue@gte.net> |
| Subject: | SB296 |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Apr 1999 01:54:44 -0400 |
All,
Here is another bill that might deserve your attention. If passed any
vehicle driven less than 5000 miles per year would be exempt from smog
testing. Sorry for using up so much bandwidth but I think many would be
interested.
Subject:
Message on bill sb_296 :
billroot:[current.sb.from0200.sb0296]sactran1.txt
Date:
Tue, 06 Apr 1999 06:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:
Senate-News-Reply@SEN.CA.GOV
To:
Recipients of bill sb_296 messages
BILL ANALYSIS
SB 296 (MOUNTJOY)
Page
{u
u}
{u SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE u} Bill No: SB 296
Senator KARNETTE, Chair Author: MOUNTJOY
VERSION: 2/3/99
Analysis by: Randall
HenryFiscal:Yes
SUBJECT:
Smog check program: exemptions.
DESCRIPTION:
This bill would exempt from the biennial vehicle inspection
and maintenance ("smog check") requirement any motor
vehicle registered to a person if the vehicle is operated
for 5,000 miles or less annually.
ANALYSIS:
California and the other states must comply with federal
air quality standards. Motor vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M or "smog check") programs are integral
parts of the effort to reduce mobile-source air pollution
and meet overall air quality requirements. Despite the
existence of I/M programs, automobiles and trucks produce
half or more of the ozone air pollution, nearly all of the
carbon monoxide air pollution in the United States and
substantial quantities of nitrogen oxides and other air
toxics.
Current law provides for two versions of the vehicle
inspection program ("Smog Check II") in the state: (1) an
{u enhanced u} smog check program in urbanized areas of the state
classified as serious, severe or extreme nonattainment
areas for ozone, or moderate or serious nonattainment for
carbon monoxide, and (2) a {u basic u} program in other areas of
the state where a program was in existence before the
Legislature's enactment of the 1994 legislative package.
The enhanced program slowly is being gradually phased-in.
The Legislature last session enacted several measures
modifying the smog check program:
SB 296 (MOUNTJOY)
Page
{u
u}
{u Assembly Bill 57 (Escutia u} )-required the establishment
of a low-income repair assistance program by March 1,
1998, through "gold shield" test-and-repair stations for
owners of vehicles failing their emissions inspections.
The bill prescribed a $200 to $250 vehicle repair cost
limit for low-income vehicle owners, added an owner
co-payment provision, repealed the previous economic
hardship extension program in favor of a repair-cost
waiver program and allowed gross-polluting vehicles to
be subject to repair cost limits.
{u Assembly Bill 208 (Migden u} )-required revenues from the
vehicle smog impact fee to be redirected from the
General Fund to the smog check repair assistance
program, established a $4 annual smog abatement fee for
newer vehicles exempted from the smog check (by AB
1492), and authorized an additional $2 annual fee for
low-income repair assistance if the smog impact fee is
ruled unconstitutional by a court.
{u Assembly Bill 1492 (Baugh u} )-exempted from the biennial
smog check requirement vehicles four or less model years
old, lowered the maximum repair cost limit for low-income
vehicle owners to $200 to $250 and stated the
Legislature's intent to replace the inspection and
maintenance program by January 1, 2005.
{u Senate Bill 43 (Kopp u} )-exempted from the biennial and
change-of-ownership smog check requirement vehicles
manufactured before the 1974 model year and exempted all
30-year old vehicles beginning in 2003.
{u This bill u} would exempt from the biennial smog check program
those vehicles that are driven 5,000 miles or less
annually. The bill also would provide the issuance of a
waiver by a referee at a test-only station upon the request
of the vehicle owner for a vehicle that qualifies for the
waiver, for a fee not to exceed $5.
COMMENTS:
1. According to the author, the bill "exempts cars which
are driven less than 5,000 miles per year from the biennial
smog check program. It is frequently driven cars, rather
SB 296 (MOUNTJOY)
Page
{u
u}
than those driven very little, which have the greatest
impact on air quality. There are many drivers, especially
senior citizens, who drive very little, perhaps just to the
market, medical appointments, and short trips near their
homes. They can neither afford costly vehicle repairs nor
can they afford the purchase of a new car. If these
drivers lose their cars, they lose their mobility."
2. The bill raises a number of issues and policy
considerations, including:
What is the potential number of vehicles which would be
exempted and what effect on air quality would such
exemptions produce?
Would it create an incentive for odometer tampering or
fraud?
How would the Department of Motor Vehicles and the Bureau
of Automotive Repair
accurately determine the mileage of eligible vehicles?
Would the proposed $5 fee be
sufficient to cover the notice, recordkeeping,
certification and waiver issuance costs?
Is there a demonstrated need for such a waiver, given the
average smog repair costs
are not excessive and that the state has enacted and
provided funding for a low-cost
repair assistance program?
3. The Committee last year considered Senate Bill 2185
(Mountjoy), which would have exempted from the biennial
vehicle inspection and maintenance requirement any motor
vehicle registered to a person 60 years of age or who is
disabled, if the vehicle is operated for 5,000 miles or
less annually. The bill was defeated, 3-3.
4. The opposition contends that this measure "would reduce
the emissions reduction potential of the Smog Check program
and degrade air quality statewide. While any given vehicle
will pollute more each mile that it is driven, not all
low-mileage vehicles are low emitters. Poorly maintained,
defective, or tampered low-mileage vehicles can all pollute
significantly more than high-mileage vehicles. While the
SB 296 (MOUNTJOY)
Page
{u
u}
current Smog Check program helps reduce the emissions these
vehicles cause, this bill would allow these problems to be
ignored."
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the Committee before noon on
Wednesday,
3/31/99)
SUPPORT: 15 individual letters
OPPOSED: California Air Pollution Control Officers
Association
Bay Area Air Quality
Management District
4/1/99
Rick
1582 Only 15 letters sent in on this one.