DeTomaso Mailing List: January 00, Message #7

[previous topic]           [index] [next] [next topic]
From: brockctella@juno.com
Subject:Re: Justification for larger tires?
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:44:07 -0500


Mike, the real problem with the BFG 305's is they stink as a handling
tire. Huge sidewall flex and the traction of Teflon. Probably will get
50,000 miles off of them.

On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:13:58 -0500 "Mike Dailey"
<mdailey.tectel@home.com> writes:
>Cal,
>
>While I was out checking on the progress on my car today I had my 
>first
>chance to see my front and back wheels setting side-by-side.  When I 
>had my
>new BFG Euro T/A treads installed last year I took the front wheels in 
>to
>have them installed then the back ones in separately, so I never saw 
>them
>side-by-side.  I'm running 225/50/15 on the front and 305/50/15 on the 
>back.
>They are mounted on 7" rims on the front and 10" on the back.  I knew 
>the
>back wheels were big but to see them side-by-side, wow!
>
>To make a long story short the big 15" Euro T/A treads are cheep and 
>look
>great!!!  And they are speed rated to 130!!
>
>This post is most likely going to start a debate about only having H 
>rated
>treads on a Pantera but my car will probably not see 130 with me in it 
>any
>time soon!!!
>
>Does anyone know what the rating was on the original 1971 Pantera 
>treads?
>Did we even have speed ratings in 1971?
>
>
>Mike
>(#1887, looks cool with big treads)
>www.TecTelSolutions.com/pantera/
>
>T  e  c  T  e  l    S  o  l  u  t  i  o  n  s
>"An Information Technology and Telecommunications Consulting Group"
>mdailey@TecTelSolutions.com                      
>www.TecTelSolutions.com
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


[previous topic]           [index] [next] [next topic]