DeTomaso Mailing List: April 2000, Message #204

[previous topic]           [index] [next] [next topic]
From: FlyinRider@aol.com
Subject:Fwd: Help cleveland manifold question
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 20:57:16 -0400



--part1_b3.22eb914.26212f3f_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 

--part1_b3.22eb914.26212f3f_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: FlyinRider@aol.com
From: FlyinRider@aol.com
Full-name: FlyinRider
Message-ID: <6a.1b42faa.2620d814@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 14:44:36 EDT
Subject: Help cleveland manifold question
To: detomaso@realbig.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 61

OK help please.  Just pulled the edelbrock "F351-4V" manifold off to polish 
it.  But the port size difference between the two jumped out and bit me.  Got 
out the vernier caliper and measured the two.  The heads are big 2.5" x 1.75" 
 and the manifold measured in at 2.15" x 1.38" I always was taught to port 
match the two.  I am assuming that edelbrock may have left some material on 
to match with hence the funny numbers.  But when I looked up in the edelbrock 
catalog they don't list manifolds for the different size port selection of 
the different Cleveland heads?  If it wasn't Saturday I would call them to 
find out.  Anyone have this dilemma before?  Help looks like IM going to have 
to break open the wallet again.

thanks john 6377

--part1_b3.22eb914.26212f3f_boundary--


[previous topic]           [index] [next] [next topic]