DeTomaso Mailing List: May 2000, Message #146

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------BC16F1869C95AC6F0425176F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Resending this in case all the folks that were in Vegas missed it.
--------------BC16F1869C95AC6F0425176F
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Message-ID: <390A8985.7B777081@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 00:04:37 -0700
From: Rick <rwgushue@gte.net>
Organization: Not Organized
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win16; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Multiple recipients of list <detomaso@realbig.com>
Subject: Smog and CARB Folks
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This was sent to me on another list. Check out this url for the full
story.

http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20000428/t000040127.html

 The LA Times this morning had an article stating that the
> Smog II program has been 'watered-down' sufficiently that
> it is not effective in lowering smog in California.  The
> California Air Resources Board is concerned that Calif
> will not meet the EPA mandated clean air requirements.
> 
> Specifically they named laws such as the 'pre 74
> collector car exemption' for being responsible for this
> ineffectiveness.  They also referred to general 'consumer
> friendly' laws that took the effectiveness out of smog
> II.  They claim that thru these laws, Smog II has become
> ineffective and that polluting cars are escaping repairs.
> 
> There is a meeting planned for May 2 in Sacremento where
> CARB folks will discuss rescinding some of these laws.
> 
> You can read the article at www.latimes.com (search on
> 'smog').  Also, once again, write your state
> representatives.

  Rick
  1582


--------------BC16F1869C95AC6F0425176F--