DeTomaso Mailing List: August 2000, Message #39
| From: | MikeLDrew@aol.com |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Correction to POCA newsletter |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:44:54 -0400 |
Jim wrote:
>So who really does have the rights to import/distribute any car called a
Pantera at this point??
>>>DeTomaso. They surrendered that right in 1972 to Ford when Ford purchased
DeTomaso Automobili. But then A. DeTomaso purchased his company back from
Ford (for a fraction of the cost) in 1974 and regained the rights.
As part of the Qvale agreement, Qvale took over the rights to the name
Pantera, but as part of the "divorce", DeTomaso got the name back again.
>Didn't Lee Iaocca (sic) have the rights for awhile when he was at Chrysler?
Seems I remember they put a low-powered Dodge V-8 in a prototype Pantera,
then decided it would never work.
>>>Nope. Iacocca and DeTomaso are buddies from way back, and Chrysler
dabbled with the idea of producing a Chrysler-powered Pantera as part of a
joint venture (since they were already involved in a joint venture with
DeTomaso-owned Maserati, producing the TC by Maserati.) Shelby was also
involved as a consultant.
At least two late Panteras were converted to Mopar power; Shelby retained one
(a white GT5 if I believe; Scott Black is familiar with the car) and another
is a red GTS now owned by Paul Donderwinkel, late of England and now in New
Zealand. The Donderwinkel car boasts a twin-turbo small-block Chrysler motor.
But at the same time, the Dodge boys had doodled up a cartoon car they called
the Viper. They wheeled it out on the car show circuit and the whole world
went berserk for it. And the TC by Maserati venture quickly proved to be a
major flop. Finally, Chrysler had purchased Lamborghini outright, and thus
already had a corporate Italian mid-engined exotic in their stable. These
unrelated events completely doomed any potential Chrysler/DeTomaso Pantera
venture.
Mike