DeTomaso Mailing List: September 2000, Message #159

[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]
From: "NED BYRNE, UVEST INV" <NEDB@bloomberg.net>
Subject:Fwd: RE: Spicers v. stock shaft
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:57:21 -0400


I havn't priced them yet, and as a result havn't ordered any....what I thought
was a rear bearing turns out to be two U-joints.  I was just about to get
pricing and shipping to the Right coast and, as usual, I didn't know there
was a better joint out there.     Ned
---- Original Msg from: Cal J Eustaquio  <cal.j.eustaquio@lmco.com> At:  9/ 6 11

Who are you getting the joints from? Cal. 

> ----------
> From: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV[SMTP:NEDB@bloomberg.net]
> Reply To: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV
> Sent: 	Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:20 AM
> To: 	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: 	Fwd: Spicers v. stock shaft
> 

> Didn't know there were new U-joints out there.  I'm about to order two;
> one
> for each side.  What was changed and who has them?
>     Ned  "Just another blue Pantera" # 2981 72 Pre-L
> ---- Original Msg from: Cal J Eustaquio  <cal.j.eustaquio@lmco.com> At:
> 9/ 6 11
> 
> All:
> I'll toss another "controversial" one in the chute: Spicers v. stock
> shafts
> (improved). I've heard folks say that the Spicer shafts are stronger than
> the stock shafts. However, I've been hearing different opinions (at least
> the few that has been sent to me privately). 
> 

> I've considering going the former but after having heard about the
> improved
> shafts (the ones that now have new u-joints that don't bust up like the
> factory stock units), I've had to rethink my views on these. Any comments,
> criticisms? Thanks. Cal #2428/#6659.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]