DeTomaso Mailing List: September 2000, Message #161

Thanks for the leed.....but what is the improvement/    Ned
---- Original Msg from: Cal J Eustaquio  <cal.j.eustaquio@lmco.com> At:  9/ 6 12

I'm probably going to get mine from Powertrain Industries in LA at about $28
a pop. If this is what you are talking about, they have several in stock.
Cal. 

> ----------
> From: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV[SMTP:NEDB@bloomberg.net]
> Reply To: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV
> Sent: 	Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:57 AM
> To: 	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: 	Fwd: RE: Spicers v. stock shaft
> 
> I havn't priced them yet, and as a result havn't ordered any....what I

> thought
> was a rear bearing turns out to be two U-joints.  I was just about to get
> pricing and shipping to the Right coast and, as usual, I didn't know there
> was a better joint out there.     Ned
> ---- Original Msg from: Cal J Eustaquio  <cal.j.eustaquio@lmco.com> At:
> 9/ 6 11
> 
> Who are you getting the joints from? Cal. 
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV[SMTP:NEDB@bloomberg.net]
> > Reply To: 	NED BYRNE, UVEST INV
> > Sent: 	Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:20 AM
> > To: 	Multiple recipients of list

> > Subject: 	Fwd: Spicers v. stock shaft
> > 
> 
> > Didn't know there were new U-joints out there.  I'm about to order two;
> > one
> > for each side.  What was changed and who has them?
> >     Ned  "Just another blue Pantera" # 2981 72 Pre-L
> > ---- Original Msg from: Cal J Eustaquio  <cal.j.eustaquio@lmco.com> At:
> > 9/ 6 11
> > 
> > All:
> > I'll toss another "controversial" one in the chute: Spicers v. stock
> > shafts
> > (improved). I've heard folks say that the Spicer shafts are stronger

> than
> > the stock shafts. However, I've been hearing different opinions (at
> least
> > the few that has been sent to me privately). 
> > 
> 
> > I've considering going the former but after having heard about the
> > improved
> > shafts (the ones that now have new u-joints that don't bust up like the
> > factory stock units), I've had to rethink my views on these. Any
> comments,
> > criticisms? Thanks. Cal #2428/#6659.
> > 
> > 

> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>