![]()
Miata Mailing List: August 1996, Message #125
sponsored by
From: searle@pop.srv.ualberta.ca (Searle) Subject: RE: Subframe braces + How to make your sedan outcorner a Miata Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 02:44:38 -0400
>You'll probably get a lot of replies, but subframe braces and sway bars >are two different animals. Braces are merely passive chassis stiffeners >and (anti) sway bars are active suspension components. I'm going to split hairs here, but it is all in the name of an interesting anecdote: (Anti) sway bars (Hair split #1 - more properly termed anti-roll bars) are not active suspension components (Hair split #2), since they can only passively react to body roll. Active suspension in the true sense, where hydraulic pistons, actuated by a complex combination of road and vehicle sensors, totally replace both springs and shocks. F-1 used this technology extensively until it was banned a few years ago, and Lotus Engineering Group (among others) was devising a system for road use. Sadly, it never saw production. The only North American production car that I know of to make use of some of this technology is the Infiniti Q45 with the (really expen$ive) semi-active suspension option. Semi-active because the piston wasn't capable of supporting the full weight of the car at all times, and so relied on a regular coil spring at each wheel. Cost and power considerations (the hydraulic pump required really puts a load on the engine) resulted in this compromise So, here's the interesting anecdote: How about a bone stock four-door sedan - equipped with all the usual luxury items, including a boulevard-soft suspension that can put most Cadillacs to shame - that can pull over 1.0G on the skidpad? Well, Citreon, the French company that builds all those weird cars that you can't get over here anymore, had a really brilliant idea on how to overcome the compromises most manufacturers have to accept when they install anti-roll bars. To whit: * strong anti-roll bars prevented body roll, but played havoc with the ride quality under certain circumstances. * weak (or no) anti-roll bars allowed the ride to remain cushy, but the resulting body roll played havoc with suspensions geometries, etc. Well, Citreon didn't want to compromise ride comfort. After all, their hydraulic suspension design was so forgiving that you could literally drive over a speed bump at speed, and barely feel it (I've actually experienced this sensation, and it's uncanny). Their solution to the problem was to design an 'active' anti-roll bar end-link that could automatically adjust in stiffness, much like many adjustable bars sold on the aftermarket, only more quickly, and involving less grease on the driver's collar. In full-soft mode (for comfort) the link was essentially disconnected, and motion from one wheel was completely isolated from the other. Full-stiff mode, on the other hand, allowed essentially no body roll at all. Thus, the tire could stay as close to vertical as possible, and allow the maximum stiction - in this case over 1.0G on stock tires. Photos of the car going around a corner looked really weird. Without the stock car next to it dragging its door handles on the asphalt for comparison purposes, you would swear that they merely took a photo of the car while it was standing still. Drivers were continually amazed at the average speed they could maintain down twisty roads, without the usual drama, and without complaints from their passengers. Moral: If you need to carry more than one passenger, and don't want to compromise on cornering fun, import one of these beauties. So what if you can't get any parts for it when it breaks down. You could always pretend it's British. Steven Searle '93 Black & Red L.E. Q: Why do the British drink warm beer? A: Because they have Lucas refrigerators.